|
Report
of Frans Van Haren, President and CEO of the Earth Council
Moderator
for the Non-Governmental Organisations Roundtable
At the Earth Dialogues Forum
Closing Plenary Session
February 23, 2002
Lyon, France
The 200 persons in the room were particularly stimulated by the provocative
question posed by Yolanda Kakabadse from IUCN, when she asked rhetorically:
Is the Earth a Planet or a Market?
From that provocative question onwards we discussed many actual and perceived
controversies and impediments towards sustainable development.
I will just mention four of the many controversies that we discussed:
1) the logic of sustainable development versus the logic
of globalization
2) life versus money (the value of life versus the value
of money)
3) property rights versus qualified human rights
4) having more versus being more as humans
And I could go on, but the message is clear.
From there, the next question was how, in a practical way, can we bridge
the gap between all those controversies. And we found, not as a
panacea for all our problems, but as a realistic and practical approach,
that the push for common human norms and values, could bridge these tensions
and conflicts.
So indeed, we would answer the question whether ethics is the missing
link affirmatively. It has a bridge function.
From that conclusion onwards we had a constant reference to the Earth
Charter as a true peoples document that could very well provide
that link once again not as a panacea for all problems but as a
reference point. It is multipurpose:
It could:
1) assist human beings - you and me - in the process
to overcome differences
2) function as a strong educational tool
3) turn into an instrument of soft law
So how does that translate into recommendations that make sense, politically
and strategically?
1) First, enumerating the many outstanding issues, ranging
from debt relief to unsatisfaction with WTO-requirements, let us adopt
a normative framework to guide us. In this respect many referred
to the Earth Charter as a good code for responsible behavior.
2) The Roundtable appealed to the environmental movement
to make common cause with the disarmament movement this was but
one example of the need to build coalitions in order to be more effective
just like private enterprises are often looking for coalitions and cooperation.
3) Through legislators we should increase the degree
of accountability of the corporate use of the common goods.
4) It was strongly felt that there is a need to bring
the many multilateral agreements related to sustainable development and
environment closer to the people they should be translated into
understandable language.
5) Do something about education and awareness raising,
not only at the formal level, but also at the level of private enterprise
- training in sustainable development.
6) Set up a private/public Fund with particular challenges
to the private sector, including NGOs, as a new catalyst for private and
entrepreneurial initiatives in the area of sustainable development, benefiting
also traditional recipients of Official Development Assistance.
7) Be sure that sustainable development work at the
local level gets the recognition and space that it deserves.
8) Integrate Habitat issues more thoroughly
into sustainable development policies. This appeal is both to government
and to industry.
9) Think about persuasion/education of the media and
their own responsibility towards sustainable development. Abusive
advertisement was specifically mentioned in this respect.
10) Safeguard outer space from environmental degradation.
11) Finally, Mr. Chair, the issue of water and energy received much
attention. As far as the essential source of life water -
is concerned, it was felt that it should remain within the realm of the
public domain.
As to energy, it was felt that a special facility for energy could be
created, be it an energy research fund or a consultative group for clean
energy.
Mr. Chair all these recommendations are realistic and attainable.
They form, I hope, a clear reflection of what was an exciting day.
|